Strategic Factors Effecting Employee Performance: Essentially Ignored by HR

Improving employee performance is the most critical objective of any business. But, this factor is often ignored by HR departments of many organizations from time to time. While most HR experts recognize that their role involves setting up strategy, techniques, and projects representing effective employee management only few HR personnel associate such components to expanding worker’s productivity (volume, speed, and quality) per every dollar spent on work costs.

Mostly additional projects are added to balance out the employee compensation in line with the market trends irrespective of their actual productivity and performance. This way the performance of the employees is further hindered and leads to lower productivity. The role of HR in this matter is very critical and must be fully understood and well played. But in order to do so, it is essential for the HR department to understand the key factors that work as a stimulator when it comes to increasing employee performance and productivity.

In light of many years of observational research into what drives team and employee individual performance, we have distinguished the accompanying elements that fundamentally impact (positive/negative) individual/group efficiency.


  1. A corporate methodology and plan make goals clear — a focused business strategy increases the chances of success of an organization which in turn can build commitment. What’s more, if the plan and the technique are clear and very much imparted, will make your workers more persuaded, as well as knowing the vital course will help them stay centered. Corporate qualities that are measured and compensated can likewise adjust conduct and assemble responsibility.
  2. A defined purpose will make roles clear — each specialty unit and group needs to comprehend its part. Leaders and managers need to build up an unmistakable and imparted reason that is both convincing and that makes individuals feel critical. Comprehend that employees will probably be focused on the reason for the unit or group in the event that they are included in making it. An indistinct mission will bring about an absence of center and a low level of “engagement” and responsibility toward accomplishing it.
  3. Group and individual objectives — having clear operational objectives lets everybody recognize what is normal. On the off chance that these objectives are conveyed and quantifiable, workers will see decisively what is imperative and what is most certainly not. In the event that extend however reachable objectives are set, workers are more averse to wind up careless.
  4. Prioritization for impactful resource allotment — setting clear needs guarantees that time and assets are assigned to the most critical and impactful errands. Workers must be made mindful of both high-and low-need objectives, undertakings, procedures, and clients. Forms must be produced to guarantee that assets are allotted excessively to high need undertakings.
  5. Performance measurements for persistent change — having viable measurements and reporting forms strengthen both group and individual objectives. Since whatever is measured and reported completes, measurements give center, criticism and result in consistent change.

Managing workforce needs responsibility when it comes to productivity for optimizing the Return Over Investment (ROI). Many HR personnel are of the opinion that it’s the role of managers but they need to understand that managers are neither knowledgeable nor experts over how to achieve that and HR needs to play a very critical role in this regard.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>